Two routes of administration of mitomycin C in a trabeculectomy

Background: The introduction of mitomycin C (MMC) as an adjunct to trabeculectomy was a major advance in the ability to improve the Intra ocular pressure lowering efficiency of the procedure. The time tested traditional way of administration of MMC is via a sponges soaked in it, duration and concentration varies depending on risk of failure. A subconjunctival injection of MMC instead of these sponges is recently being used as a promising alternative. Purpose: Here is the video demonstrating the 2 possible ways to prepare and apply MMC during a trabeculectomy surgery. Synopsis: Intraoperative injection of MMC in trabeculectomy has several advantages over conventional method ofsponge application. A large MMC treatment area produces more diffuse and elevated blebs. Large-area MMC application also seems to increase long-term success without increasing the complication rates in trabeculectomies. Direct and diffuse application of MMC by injection may promote less scarring and vascularization of the bleb. To achieve the same surface area of exposure with sponges, i.e.achieved with injection, the surgeon must use multiple sponges, all of which must be carefully collected thereafter. The injection method,therefore,eliminates the risk of retained sponges. Highlights: injection of MMC may be as safe and as effective as conventional sponge application of MMC with comparable estimated complete treatment success with relatively lower complication rates

Two routes of administration of mitomycin C in a trabeculectomy

Background: The introduction of mitomycin C (MMC) as an adjunct to trabeculectomy was a major advance in the ability to improve the Intra ocular pressure lowering efficiency of the procedure. The time tested traditional way of administration of MMC is via a sponges soaked in it, duration and concentration varies depending on risk of failure. A subconjunctival injection of MMC instead of these sponges is recently being used as a promising alternative. Purpose: Here is the video demonstrating the 2 possible ways to prepare and apply MMC during a trabeculectomy surgery. Synopsis: Intraoperative injection of MMC in trabeculectomy has several advantages over conventional method ofsponge application. A large MMC treatment area produces more diffuse and elevated blebs. Large?area MMC application also seems to increase long?term success without increasing the complication rates in trabeculectomies. Direct and diffuse application of MMC by injection may promote less scarring and vascularization of the bleb. To achieve the same surface area of exposure with sponges, i.e.achieved with injection, the surgeon must use multiple sponges, all of which must be carefully collected thereafter. The injection method,therefore,eliminates the risk of retained sponges. Highlights: injection of MMC may be as safe and as effective as conventional sponge application of MMC with comparable estimated complete treatment success with relatively lower complication rates

Surgical outcomes of repeat trabeculectomy augmented with high dose mitomycin C

Purpose: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of repeat trabeculectomy augmented with risk factor adjusted mitomycin C (MMC) exposure in eyes with previous failed trabeculectomy. Methods: Case records of 38 eyes of 37 patients with previous failed filter who underwent repeat trabeculectomy with MMC were reviewed retrospectively. Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, requirement of anti-glaucoma medications, postoperative complications, and surgical success (defined as IOP of ?21 mmHg and >5 mmHg along with 20% reduction from preoperative IOP with or without adjuvant medications) at 1-year postoperatively. Statistical analysis was done using the STATA 14.1 (Texas, USA). Results: Patient's mean age was 46.41 (±20.43) years and the mean preoperative IOP was 32.73 (±9.26) mmHg which reduced to 16.22 (±7.08) mmHg postoperatively at 12 months (P < 0.001). Mean number of anti-glaucoma medications reduced from 2.76 (±0.83) preoperatively to 1.89 (±0.95) postoperatively (P < 0.001). Surgical success was observed in 81.1% at 1 year (n = 30). Eyes that received MMC >3 min had a postoperative mean IOP of 12.50 (±3.23) mmHg compared to 23.08 (±7.19) mmHg with MMC <3 min (P < 0.001). Seven eyes (18.4%) developed postoperative complications, and all were seen in eyes that received MMC >3 min (P = 0.033). Conclusion: Repeat trabeculectomy with MMC, used in higher concentration and exposure time altered according to individual risk factor plays a crucial role in the success and hence it could be considered as a viable option before planning a tube surgery.